Sunday, October 30, 2016
making money from adf.ly
“Wow! I made some money online.” This was my reaction when I made few cents within a day using AdF.ly. It is impossible to forget that moment because it was the first time I made some money online. That motivated me and since then I have made hundreds of dollars online using many other methods.
What is AdF.ly?
So the first question that comes to your mind is “What is AdF.ly?” so let's start discussing about Adf.ly.
Adf.ly is website that pays you money every time someone clicks on your shortened Adf.ly links.
Still Confused? Let me Explain.
Adf.ly is an URL shortening service similar to Bit.ly.
- You input a link on AdF.ly. For example “google.com”
- AdF.ly shortens it and gives you a links
- You share the shortened link anywhere on the web.
- Someone clicks on your link
How AdF.ly works?
However I have provided you an overview of the working of AdF.ly, there are some questions left why adf.ly pays you and how adf.ly itself make money. To make it more clear let us take an example. Think of an advertiser who wants to sell his product or promote his online business. So he want more visitors to see his business or buy his product: AdF.ly is the solution for the advertiser. Let's check out the complete working of AdF.ly:
- Advertiser pays money to Adfly to show his website to visitors of any specific country or the whole world. Let’s say advertiser paid $2 for 1000 visits.
- Adfly takes a cut. Let’s say Adfly takes $0.4.
- Adfly shows the advertisement (of advertiser's business or product) for 5 seconds when a visitor clicks on publisher’s links. Publisher gets rest of $1.6 for 1000 visits on his link.
Now you have the complete idea of the working of AdF.ly. Let’s turn to the question “Is AdF.ly a scam?”
Adf.ly: Legit or Scam?
Adf.ly is not a scam; there are several points that prove it.
- It was started on 2009. It is six years now as of 2015. Only legit sites can live for so much of time.
- According to Alexa, Adfly is among the top 100 websites of the world. Can you ever think of a scam site in the top 100 websites of the world?
- It has more than 2 million users registered which prove that adf.ly a famous and legit site.
- They always pay on time.
How to Join Adf.ly?
then, this is the link to join adf.ly : http://adf.ly/?id=15003503
How to Make Money from Adf.ly?
Best thing I like about Adfly is that even a person that do not know much about computers, internet and other tech stuffs can also make money from it. There is no specific strategy to make money from Adfly. I am going to give you some of the ideas to make money from it but it doesn’t mean that these are the only ways to make money. Be creative to make your own ways to share your links so that it reaches to the huge number of people and they click on it.
In a nutshell, a person is only going to click your links if you have something interesting or valuable to share through your links. Here are some of the places you can share your links. But before you share your links; be sure you have something people want to check out. Let’s start:
Post on forums
Most of the forums allow links in your posts. Find a trending topic that is going to be trending for few months at least (So that you can make money for months). Find forums related to that topic and sign up to them. Find something related to that topic and post on them on the forums. Keep increasing your posts solely (Note: Never spam or you will get banned from forums).You will see your earnings increasing slowly.
Comment on blogs
This is similar to the above trick. Just the difference is that this time you are posting on blogs related to your topic.
Using Social Networks
Social networks are place where people usually share links. Only you have to do is that, find some famous social networks and before posting any link shorten it with adf.ly. But you should take care that a person after seeing the advertisement and skipping the ad, should get something interesting. If he gets something junk, surely he is not going to click your links anymore in the future.
Note: Most famous social networks like facebook, twitter etc. have banned adf.ly links. Don’t worry there are other social networks which have not banned them.
Using Blog or Website
If you have a blog or a website, you can use it to make money from Adf.ly. Just change your outgoing links to adf.ly links or you can also their full page script or website entry script.
Note: I never recommend you to use adf.ly links on professional blog or website.
so if you wanna try it you can join adf.ly from here : http://adf.ly/?id=15003503
Saturday, October 29, 2016
Why everything you know about cancer is wrong
Many people think that cancer is caused by DNA damage and that not even nature can cure cancer. Both of these assumptions are pure nonsense. Most likely everything you know about cancer was intentionally designed to deceive you so that cancer patients will choose the wrong cancer treatments.
Why would someone spread false information about cancer? That is what this article is about.
Let us start with a three-question test:
- What causes a cell to be cancerous?
- What is the 5-year “cure rate” of orthodox medicine, meaning what percent of their cancer patients are alive five years after diagnosis?
- What is the 5-year “cure rate” of several of the best-known natural cancer treatment experts?
Most people think that cancer is caused by DNA damage and that orthodox medicine is frantically searching for a cure for cancer.
There are two problems with these beliefs. Both beliefs are complete nonsense and come from the propaganda and deceptions of television.
Cancer is not caused by DNA damage. The definition of a cancer cell is a cell with low ATP energy (i.e. a low level of adenosine triphosphate). It is difficult to imagine a cell biologist who is so stupid they think that DNA damage can cause low levels of ATP energy. Only a very, very small fraction of DNA has anything to do with the creation of ATP energy.
Yet the media glorifies all of the “cancer researchers” who are diligently trying to “fix” the DNA damage of cancer cells. It is all a scam to make sure that cures for cancer are never found.
The truth is that there are many people who know how to cure cancer. They just don’t work for the pharmaceutical industry and you don’t hear about them in the media and they don’t win Nobel Prizes.
The low ATP level is actually caused by microbes which are inside the cancer cells, generally Helicobacter Pylori. This is an amazing microbe which can have 16 different sizes and shapes and sizes depending on the pH it is exposed to.
This microbe intercepts glucose as it enters the cancer cells and thus reduces the amount of glucose available to be converted into pyruvate. With less pyruvate, the cell will create less ATP energy (or course I am skipping many steps in this process). For a more detailed discussion read What Causes Cancer.
The ICRF has developed more than 20 cancer treatments which revert the cancer cells into normal cells. How do they revert cancer cells into normal cells? They safely target and kill the microbes inside the cancer cells.
Killing cancer cells is “old school” but there is nothing wrong with things that can safely target and kill cancer cells (such as purple grape juice), but the new approach is to kill the microbes inside the cancer cells. This was first done in the 1930s but that technology was persecuted and shut down by the FDA and AMA. It has been restored, however, by the High RF Frequency Devices (which are not their real name, which we cannot use on this website due to the FDA).
About cure rates
You probably think that orthodox medicine (e.g. the pharmaceutical industry, oncologists, the American Medical Association or AMA, etc.) has a 5-year cure rate for cancer patients of more than 50 percent. A “5-year cure rate” would mean, by definition, that 50 percent or more of their cancer patients are still alive five years after being diagnosed with cancer.
You probably think that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is not only doing its best to find cures for cancer but are shutting down “quacks” who are pretending to cure cancer but in fact do not know how to cure cancer.
You probably think that the media is constantly looking for who has the best cure rates for cancer so the media’s investigative journalists can keep the general public apprised of who has the most effective cancer treatments.
And so on.
Are your assumptions correct? NO.
Cure rates are not an academic issue because you, the reader, may get cancer some day or you may know someone who gets cancer, such as a spouse or relative. Your very life, or the life of a friend of loved-one, may be on the line as you decide who is telling the truth about cancer research.
Choosing a cancer treatment is literally a life-and-death decision. The “cure rates” for different cancer treatments can range from 3 to 95 percent for the same type of cancer. So who is telling the truth and who is lying? And if they are lying, why are they lying?
So let’s talk about cure rates.
First, what is the overall 5-year cure rate of the oncology profession according to their own statistics?
Second, what was the cure rate of a South African immigrant who used nothing but purple grape juice to treat cancer?
Before reading on, take a guess at the answers to both of these questions and write your answers down to see how you did.
According to Dr. Jonathon Stegall, the answer to the first question is this:
“A 2004 study in the journal Clinical Oncology evaluated the contribution of chemotherapy to 5-year survival rates among adult cancer patients. In other words, the goal of the study was to look at how significant chemotherapy’s role was in successful treatment outcomes (defined by oncologists as 5-year survival). In order to arrive at a meaningful conclusion, data from many previous studies was pooled and analyzed. The 22 most common cancer types were included in the study.
“The results were surprising. The overall contribution of chemotherapy to five-year survival in American adults was 2.1 percent. This means that approximately 98 percent of the credit for survival was attributed to all other treatments, such as surgery, radiation, nutrition, etc.
“It is important to note that this study is often misquoted. You have probably heard this statistic quoted in a way which suggests that those receiving chemotherapy only have a 2.1 percent 5-year survival rate.
“In reality, the average five-year survival rate for cancer is 69 percent. This includes all stages of cancer and makes no distinction between who received which treatments. However, given the most commonly used treatments in oncology today, it is safe to assume that many of these surviving patients received chemotherapy.
“At this point, it is important to discuss what 5-year survival means. In the oncology world, 5-year survival measures the percentage of patients who are still alive five years from the date of diagnosis. It does not mean that they are cancer-free, and it does not mean that they are completely healthy. Instead, it simply means that they have not died from cancer (or any other cause) in the five years since diagnosis.
“Survival rates can be further broken down. For example, cancer-specific survival looks at the percentage of patients with a particular type of cancer and can be further broken down to look at survival rates for each stage of cancer. Using the 5-year survival statistic with respect to breast cancer, we see that Stage 0 or Stage I breast cancer has a 5-year survival rate of nearly 100 percent.
“For Stage II breast cancer, the five-year survival rate is 93 percent, while for Stage III breast cancer, the 5-year survival rate is 72 percent.
“Stage IV breast cancer has a 5-year survival rate of approximately 22 percent. Thus, when we look at survival rates for cancer, it is important to be as specific as possible with regard to cancer type and cancer stage since some cancers have very poor survival rates while others have very good ones.
“I always tell my patients that it is important to look at survival statistics on the population level in order to know what we are dealing with, but it is equally important to realize that those statistics do not necessarily apply to them. Many factors contribute to treatment outcomes, and many of those are directly in the patient’s control.”
As if the battle against cancer weren’t bad enough, some chemical companies seem dedicated to making you sick so that you will need prescription drugs. For example, Monsanto loves to put chemicals in your foods and loves for you to eat GMO foods. Because the average person has been brainwashed by the media, they think that nature can do nothing to help cancer.
The answer to the second question is this: Johanna Brandt’s cure rate was 100 percent.
Johanna Brandt did not need to know how to cure cancer, Nature had to know how to cure cancer. And Nature had put at least 12 chemicals in purple grape juice that can kill cancer cells.
The best way to survive cancer is to figure out what Nature has already done.
hope you like this article .
Saturday, October 22, 2016
is the solar system really moving through the universe ?
i'm wondring if the solar system a vortex !!!!
- we learn in school that the earth and the planets revolve around the sun, but another point of view also exist .
the solar system is moving through the space at a speed of 70.000 KM/H . the rotation of planets is like a whirlpool . The sun itself, similar to a comet, pulls along the earth and the other planets in its tail .
it's just a theory, but a beautiful one, let's find out if it's real !!!
-If you’re even a casual space fan you may have seen a viral gif animation showing our solar system traveling through space, the motions of the planets tracing corkscrew “vortex” paths around a line-driving Sun. While it’s definitely intriguing to watch (in that mesmerizingly-repetitive gif fashion) and rendered with a talented flair for design, there are two fundamental problems with it. One: it’s not entirely correct, scientifically, and two: its creator’s intention is to illustrate a decidedly un-scientific point of view about the Solar System and the Universe as a whole.
There’s this annoying space GIF roaming the internet causing trouble. Perhaps you’ve seen it. No ? Well, here it is.
What it purports to show is the motion of the Solar System through space. But the accuracy of this has been utterly derided as an affront to scientific dignity. Which is a shame, because the video version is really quite nicely done, with good camera movement and a catchy soundtrack. The principle antagonist is notorious “Bad Astronomer” Phil Plait, who wrote a convincing and virulent attack on the video. I decided to investigate for myself.
Like many people, I was at first glance really quite impressed with the video, and didn’t have any major objections to it. Obviously the orbits and size of the planets are not to scale (and I think their orbital speeds have be altered too), but that’s just to make them visible. Fair enough. But then I read Phil Plait’s analysis, and it seems that things are much, much worse than that.
The orbits of the major planets of the solar system all lie in a narrow plane (like being in economy class! hahaha… sorry), which is tilted at about 60 degrees to the disc of stars that forms the Milky Way.
We’ll return to the tilt in a moment. But first, if the Sun was really leading the planets, then the thing is completely ludicrous (and this is quite a major part of Plait’s argument). Yet I’m not so sure the viral gif does show the Sun leading the planets. Having read through the author’s website, I can’t find any evidence that he suggests this.
It seems to me that the appearance of the Sun leading the planets in the gif is just the result of a projection effect – i.e. that things can look different from different angles. On the other hand, Plait read the source material for Sadhu’s model, so maybe there’s something in there that’s more explicit. I’ve glanced at it, but couldn’t find anything stating this precisely. Actually I couldn’t find a whole lot that was even vaguely coherent, but we’ll return to this later. For now, just keep in mind that Sadhu is using an alternative model, even though that may not always be evident.
There can be no mistaking that Sadhu’s video shows the orbits with the wrong tilt. But is that so critical? Well actually no, not really. Fact is that if you include the tilt, you still see the planets making a “spiral” pattern (technically it’s a helix) as they move through space. The overall appearance just isn’t that massively different compared to a 90-degree tilt.
So what’s the big deal? What does the author claim in this internet sensation that’s so outrageous? Well, not much. That particular video/gif are actually fairly inoffensive, to my mind. The most basic notion that the planets trace helical paths through space is perfectly correct. What honestly surprises me is that this is so incredibly popular on the internet. If you weren’t aware that the Sun orbits the center of the galaxy — which, since the planets orbit it,necessitates that they trace out helical paths — then the education system has seriously failed. But do not despair! This can be remedied very, very easily.
it's comlicated to understand this fact it's hard to remember too .
Tuesday, October 18, 2016
the truth behind zombies
Did nazis really try to make zombies ?
the nazis who had no shortage of well-documented kooky ideas, might have researched the possibility of reanimating the dead . Nazi zombies make for a grabber of a headline, but what real evidence is there that raising the dead was on the agenda for even the most outrageous among the nazis ?
we can begin with the conclusion, because that is real just the start . No reliable evidence has been found that the nazis tried to raise the dead, but though even asking the quetion why sound preposterous, a world of people believe that such a program was in the works_ and knowing that facts we do about nazis research and beliefs, this concept is entirely plausible .
The idea that the Nazis looked into the possibility of raising the dead might sound like an outtake from an Indiana Jones movie. But this is only because those plots were inspired by real, but little-known, facts. The Nazis did, in fact, have teams of researchers hunting for supernatural treasures, religious relics and entrances to a magical land of telepathic faeries and giants (I wish I were making this up). Relatively few people are aware of a very real organization that was the inspiration for the Indiana Jones plots: the Nazi Ahnenerbe, or the Ancestral Heritage Research and Teaching Organization .
there's a lot of facts about how hitler was obsessed with both the occult and the pursuit of ancient religious artefacts of supposedly great supernatural power .Hitler never had any particular interest in the occult or any topic he deemed "esoteric". In fact, in his Nuremberg speech of September 6th, 1938, he publicly expressed his condemnation of occultism in no uncertain terms: "We will not allow mystically-minded occult folk with a passion for exploring the secrets of the world beyond to steal into our Movement. Such folk are not National Socialists, but something else - in any case, something which has nothing to do with us."
about the Dachau Concentration Camp there's a lot of talking but the truth is In 1933, just three months after the National Socialist Party winning power in Germany, the SS under Himmler set up the first official concentration camp on the grounds of an abandoned munitions factory, Dachau. Before this prison camps had been hasty affairs, mostly run be either police or militia, used to hold and torture political opponents and union organisers.
The take-over and organisational consolidation by the SS with the opening of Dachau was to signify a new era of industrial-scale murder and torture, of which Himmler was its chief architect. During the war years The Institute for Military Scientific Research became attached to The Ahnenerbe, as a consequence, Dachau became one of the main centres for unethical medical research. Typical of the kinds of horrors perpetrated included tests on behalf of the Luftwaffe, because planes were being required to fly at ever greater altitudes, to determine the maximum height it's safe for a pilot to bail from, and so they requisitioned camp prisoners, placed them unprotected in vacuum chambers and basically watched what happens to a human being at high altitude. Over, and over and over.
DID THEY REALLY LEARNED TO BRING THE DEAD BACK TO LIFE : In the end, it wasn't anything to do with the occult that leads the Nazi's to conduct experiments into bringing the dead back to life; it was a scientific curiosity. The Luftwaffe needed to know how long aircrew could survive being shot down in freezing water equally, the ill-equipped infantry fighting on the Eastern Front also needed to know how long a soldier could survive extreme hypothermia and how to protect against the effects. To those ends, Ahnenerbe scientists at Dachau started freezing prisoners to death, first to see how long it took them to die and then how long (and what it took) for them to survive death. Prisoners were forced to stand naked in the open air at temperatures as low as -6 oC until they froze, others were immersed in ice baths, and then they would find ways of bringing them back to life. Some of those experiments in revival involved dropping the victim in boiling water, and sometimes, briefly, they actually came back long enough to die all over again. Screaming. All told there were some 360 - 400 such freezing experiments, between 280 and 300 victims of which survived the experiments that initially killed them more than once. And that is where the idea for stories concerning Nazis and resurrection of the dead come from. But it isn't the end of the tale, quite yet....
there was a story about a monster and there's the truth : One of the chief "scientist" responsible for much of this, Sigmund Rascher, eventually fell foul of his Ahnenerbe paymaster, Heinrich Himmler, and was shot by firing squad, in the very same concentration camp he conducted his inhuman experiments in, Dachau - three days before the camp was liberated by the Americans in early March 1945. In a bid to please Himmler personally by "proving" Aryan population growth could be accelerated by extending child-bearing age, Rascher publicized the fact his wife had given birth to three children after having turned 48, a claim Himmler was so impressed with he used Rascher and his family as propaganda to the effect of Rascher's claims. During her fourth (now) celebrity "pregnancy" However, Mrs Rascher was arrested in the act of trying to kidnap a baby and, further investigation revealed, her three other children also turned out to be either kidnapped or bought. Himmler was a man who took personal loyalty seriously, the Totenkopf insignia he'd appropriated for his SS Officers from the army; he viewed quite literally as to mean "faithful to death". Sigmund Rascher had lied to him. And that lie had become public knowledge. It's an incredible indictment of the Nazis as a species really that the inhuman things men like Rascher did to once living people in places such as Dachau played no part whatsoever in either his downfall or arrest by the SS, but lying to Himmler (coupled with certain financial irregularities, the possibility that he may have bumped off a former lab assistant and scientific fraud), earned him a death sentence amongst the very same people he'd regarded and treated as nothing more than lab rats. The SS didn't even bother giving Rascher a trial. Not the right fate, perhaps, but a fate nevertheless, not-in-the-slightest unpoetic. What will, however, remain, forever, in the craw regarding that man and those like him, far, far longer, unfortunately, is the fact the data the Nazi's acquired through unethical experimentation is still used in mainstream medical research even today...
so now we know the whole story behind the rumors and that all of that was a lie or a virtual lie .
Saturday, October 15, 2016
sunset and sunrise colors reason
maybe you asked yourself or someone about the reason behind the change between "sunset" and "sunrise" and he did not gave you the real or the good reason, and you started thinking about it but you didn't find out .
I'll give you the real and the scientific reason bihend this phenomenon, and it's pretty simple .
- we know that the sun is low on the horizon, so the sunlight passes through more air at sunset and sunrise than during the day, when the sun is higher in the sky, more atmospher means more molecules to scatter the violet and bleu light away from our eyes .
this is my interpretation of results, and there's a lot of interpretations of this phenomenon you can find out .
Friday, October 14, 2016
ciphers and hidden messages
-Ciphers !!!!! what's the ciphers ? and in what they help us ? what's the use of them ?
a cipher (or cypher) is an algorithm for performing encryption or decryption , a series of well-defined steps that can be followed as a procedure , An alternative, less common term is encipherment.To encipher or encode is to convert information into cipher or code. In common parlance, 'cipher' is synonymous with CODE, as they are both a set of steps that encrypt a message; however, the concepts are distinct in cryptography, especially CLASSICAL CRYPTOGRAPHY.
-How could we decipher a cipher !!!!
it depends on what a cipher we wanna decipher and which kind of idden messages you got, in the entire world there's a lot of codes that can be use as cipher and there many ways how to sent a hidden message and there's no way to find out the right way to decipher it, At least now !!
so first off let's figure the kind of ciphers out .
- The "caesar cipher" :
also known as CAESAR's SHIFT or CAESAR's CODE, is one of the simplest and most widely known encryption techniques, it is a type of "substitution cipher" in which each letter in the plaintext (is information a sender wishes to transmit to a receiver) is replaced by letter some fixed number of positions down the alphabet .
i'll an example, with a left shift of 3, D would be replaced by A, E would became B, and so on .The method is named after "julius caesar"( it's a long story about him i'll tell it later ), who used it in his private correspndence .
this is the wheel of caesar to make the code more easy.
- you can arrange with your friend the best way to use this cipher and send hidden messages ;)
- The "Vigenére cipher" :
this is one of the most three complicated ciphers, it needs a high abilities of observation it took me two days to find out the way it works, so let's explain it .
THE Vigenére Cipher is a methode of uncrypting alphabetic, text by using a series of diffrent caesar cipher based on the letter of a keyword, it's a simple form of polyalphabetic substitution .
In a caesar cipher, each letter of the alphabet is shifted along some numbers of places, for example in a caesar cipher of shift 3, A would become D , B would become E and Y would become B and so on . The vigenére cipher consists of several caesar cipher in sequence with diffrent shift value .
To encrypt, a table of alphabets can be used, termed a "tabula recta" or "vigenére square" it consists of alphabet written out 26 times in diffrent rows, each alphabet shifted cyclically to the left compared to the previous alphabet from one of the rows, the alphabet used at each point depends on a repeating keyword.
For example, suppose that the plaintext to be encrypted is :
ATTACKATDAWN
the person sending the message chooses a keyword and repeats it until it matches the length of plaintext, for examle the keyword is lemon :
ATTACKATDAWN
LEMONLEMONLE
then use the table in below :
for example, the first letter of plaintext is A, is paired with L, the first letter of the key, so use row L and column A of the table. Namely L, similarly, for the second letter of the plaintext, the second letter of the key is used, the letter at row E and column T is X . The rest of the plaintext is enciphered in a similar fashion :
| Plaintext: | ATTACKATDAWN |
| Key: | LEMONLEMONLE |
| Ciphertext: | LXFOPVEFRNHR |
so this is the easest way the decipher it, and by the time it will turn easy .
- some ciphers :
there's a lot of codes and ciphers to learn like " the pig pen code" and "the transposition cipher" and "morse cipher" .
so if you learn it well you can solve some cryptograms in this web site :
http://www.cryptogram.org/resources/solve-a-cipher/
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)